What do you say about a film that hits you hard where it hurts the most,
so hard that it takes your breath away.
"Water" belongs to that rare category of films that have
the power to redefine the parameters of cinema, to realign the function
and purpose of the medium, and to restructure the way we, the audience,
look at the motion picture experience.
It's no coincidence that Deepa Mehta's heroine is named Kalyani. Lisa
Ray as the tragic but radiant widow seems to echo Nutan's Kalyani in
Bimal Roy's "Bandini". The tragic grandeur that "Water"
wears on its resplendent sleeve is a quality that sets it apart from
other reformist dramas.
The film has a great deal to say about the plight of socio-economically
challenged women, specifically the widows of Varanasi in the 1930s.
The burning ghats and the waters that flow from them symbolise the ashes-and-embers
predicament of Mehta's ashram-bound women...all plagued by the pathos
of dereliction, deprivation and, yes, prostitution.
In telling it like it is, Mehta never filches. Her elemental trilogy
("Fire", "Earth" and "Water") reflects
a harshly uncompromising sensibility. In "Water", Mehta doesn't
beautify the brutality of the widows' existence.
There are bouts of humour, dance and music (watch Lisa Ray and little
Sarala dance around their dingy room as the rain splashes romantically
on the parched streets down below, or the eruption of Holi revelry in
the ashram). A quality of luminous lyricism runs through the narration,
especially in the romantic interludes between Narayan (John Abraham)
and Kalyani (Lisa Ray), which are designed like a modern-day reworking
of the Radha-Krishna mythology.
The sheer purity and beauty of the central romance contrasts tellingly
with the squalid lives and settings that the plot negotiates.
Giles Nuttgen's camera doesn't flinch from the beauty and the grime.
The cinematography could've easily converted the multi-layered character-study
into a touristic over-view. But Nuttgen takes us into the darkest areas
of the human condition to search for the peace that prevails under the
panic of existence. And A.R. Rahman's music, his best in years, uplifts
the mood of tragic pathos.
Many moments in "Water" would comfortably qualify as pure
cinema. That moment when the oldest woman in the ashram devours a laddoo
that she had been craving for all her life could be seen as the most
satirically tragic juncture in a film on socio-culturally challenged
lives.
"Water" as the giver and the destroyer...that's the predominant
metaphor that cuts through this tale. Each time we see the porcelain
Kalyani peep out of her dungeon-like window, we know she's searching
for a horizon that most of us never find in our lifetime.
"Water"
contours and defines those glazed regions in our history that we would
rather not sharp-focus on. In many ways its depiction of the plight
of abandoned widows is a metaphor for the condition of women across
the world, and also a microcosmic view of the human condition.
The fine cast grabs your undivided attention. Seasoned performers like
Manorama (playing the head of the ashram, she's a conniving scheming
mass of vulgarity and self-interest), Seema Biswas (clenched and controlled)
and Raghuvir Yadav (a singing eunuch) blend beautifully with the central
love story embodied with supreme sensitivity in the John-Lisa pair.
And to think that we always thought of John and Lisa as actors incapable
of overcoming their inherent urbanity!
It's Sarala as little Chuhiya whom you'll find hard to get out of your
head. She is the most credible child performer on a par with Ayesha
Kapoor in Sanjay Leela Bhansali's "Black". Normally children
in Hindi films respond to adult situations in an unnaturally knowing
way. Chuhiya remains a child caught in a frightening world of persecution
and perversion.
Mehta inter-cuts the wretched lives of the characters with glimmers
of hope. Even when Mahatma Gandhi makes an unexpected appearance at
the end, the director doesn't allow her vision of poetry to be crowded
by polemics.
While you grieve for doomed, disintegrating lives, you cannot miss
the subtext of social reform that underlines their lives.
What Mehta has to say about the plight of women in India 60 years ago
remains true to this day. Hopefully, things will change before another
60 years pass. "Water" leaves us with much hope - and some
frightening misgivings.